Store-Network License, Hygiene & Insurance Compliance
Verify that each store in a chain or franchise validly holds the required licenses, food-hygiene, and insurance without receiving the originals, and because revocation stays trackable, you can confirm not just what was submitted but that it is valid now.
For chain HQ and area managers
Verify licenses, food-hygiene, and insurance across many stores without collecting certificate PDFs — eliminating forgery, expiry, and reuse risk.
-
Compliance and store-development teams at chain/franchise HQs
-
Teams verifying multi-store licenses, hygiene, and insurance in food service, retail, hospitality
-
Teams needing an evidence trail for store-opening review and renewals
Hand over the source, or just the facts?
Nothing changes on the floor. Everything changes for the receiver.
① Your team just saves, as always.
- The usual step
- Fill in the record and save
- On save
- A proof is attached (API, behind the scenes)
- The document itself
- never sent
② They just open a link.
- Proven fact
- holds the required permits, hygiene and insurance, valid
- original certificates and store-internal data
- not shown
- Login / keys
- not needed
- The document stays private — the record itself is never sent or disclosed.
- Independent verification — the receiver just opens a link. No account, no keys.
- Edits are detected — even a one-character edit fails verification.
Each store presents only a proof that it "validly holds the required license, hygiene, and insurance." Originals aren't handed over. Attributes are issuer-signed; HQ and auditors verify without seeing the contents, and revocation (expiry, withdrawal) is trackable.
(A lawful verification process for each license/insurance is assumed.)
Why the usual methods fall short.
Only work that needs all three at once — pass without exposing, independent verification, tamper-evidence — is Lemma's domain.
| Method | Pass without exposing | Independent verification | Tamper-evident | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access control / permissions | △ | ✗ | ✗ | “Someone inside could have edited it” remains possible |
| Masking / redacted copies | △ | ✗ | ✗ | Redaction work grows; the original is still unproven |
| Encrypt and store / send | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | To verify, the receiver needs it disclosed after all |
| Lemma (ZK proof)the only one with all 3 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | The receiver just opens a link |
How it works — and how to start.
We help design disclosure scope and retention, run the PoC, and support production.
Start with a 30-minute call.
Tell us the one license with the heaviest verification risk, in the first 30 minutes. No disclosure of sensitive data required.
Find the case that matches your industry and problem
Browse all 36 use cases →TRY LEMMA
Run it yourself.
No sales call needed — start hands-on with Lemma's products.