Multi-Agent Workflows
Bind every step of a multi-agent delegation chain as a ZK proof, so the final output carries a verifiable trace all the way back to the original principal.
For multi-agent platform teams
Replace piecing together "who authorized whom for what" from mutable, fragmented logs with a tamper-proof delegation trail — resolving the gap when something goes wrong.
-
AI platform and product leads rolling out multi-agent orchestration
-
Engineering leads building tool ecosystems on MCP servers and A2A protocols
-
AI governance leads in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, public sector) where the agent chain has to be auditable
Hand over the source, or just the facts?
Nothing changes on the floor. Everything changes for the receiver.
① Your team just saves, as always.
- The usual step
- Fill in the record and save
- On save
- A proof is attached (API, behind the scenes)
- The document itself
- never sent
② They just open a link.
- Proven fact
- the result was produced on an authorized delegation chain
- the intermediate steps between agents
- not shown
- Login / keys
- not needed
- The document stays private — the record itself is never sent or disclosed.
- Independent verification — the receiver just opens a link. No account, no keys.
- Edits are detected — even a one-character edit fails verification.
At each delegation step in a multi-agent workflow, Lemma generates a ZK proof that binds delegator, delegatee, scope, and timestamp. Proofs are anchored on-chain; each agent operation carries the delegation proof downstream. Tools and APIs verify the cryptographic authority of the caller, not the agent's self-attestation, before responding.
The final output carries a complete proof chain — from the original principal, through every re-delegation node, down to each tool result. When something goes wrong, you don't reconstruct it from logs; each step's authority and data access is already a cryptographic fact you can reference directly.
Where the delegation-proof layer fits into your current agent orchestration and MCP integration is what we map out in a first conversation.
Why the usual methods fall short.
Only work that needs all three at once — pass without exposing, independent verification, tamper-evidence — is Lemma's domain.
| Method | Pass without exposing | Independent verification | Tamper-evident | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access control / permissions | △ | ✗ | ✗ | “Someone inside could have edited it” remains possible |
| Masking / redacted copies | △ | ✗ | ✗ | Redaction work grows; the original is still unproven |
| Encrypt and store / send | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | To verify, the receiver needs it disclosed after all |
| Lemma (ZK proof)the only one with all 3 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | The receiver just opens a link |
How it works — and how to start.
We help design disclosure scope and retention, run the PoC, and support production.
Start with a 30-minute call.
Tell us one path where "want to delegate but can't trace it" applies, in the first 30 minutes. No agent implementation or tool spec details required.
Related Use Cases
Find the case that matches your industry and problem
Browse all 36 use cases →TRY LEMMA
Run it yourself.
No sales call needed — start hands-on with Lemma's products.